daBongo LMS AI Training Courses

Lesson Content

The case for research checklists.

A verification checklist converts one-time quality improvements into systematic habits. The first time you research what a comprehensive proposal includes, you catch ten items. The fiftieth time, you have a checklist that catches those same items in two minutes rather than twenty.

Building a domain-specific checklist with Perplexity.

"I regularly produce [document type] for [audience and purpose]. Using your research on professional standards for this type of document: (1) What are the most commonly missed accuracy issues? (2) What sources should be checked for this type of document specifically? (3) What do professional standards say this type of document must include to be considered complete? Organize this as a pre-publication verification checklist with yes/no checkable items."

Checklist categories for research verification.

Organize your checklist by:

1. Factual accuracy: Statistics, figures, quotes – each verified against original source
2. Currency: Information is current enough for the document's purpose
3. Source quality: All cited sources meet the reliability standard for this document type
4. Completeness: Key perspectives, counterarguments, and required elements are present
5. Regulatory and legal current status: Any claims about current law or regulation verified as current

Making the checklist usable.

The best checklist is the one used consistently. Keep it to the minimum that catches the most important errors in your specific work. A 5-item checklist used every time beats a 25-item checklist used occasionally.

The quarterly checklist review.

Every 90 days: what did this checklist catch? What did it miss? Refine based on real use – the checklist should evolve as your research and document experience grows.